One and Two Percent Days Becoming the Norm
Thursday, March 20, 2008 at 08:50AM A whopping 44 of the last 90 trading days have been moves of 1% (+/-) or more in the S&P 500. Fifteen of the last 90 trading days have been 2% days. Below we provide a historical rolling 90-day sum of 1% and 2% days in the index. While we've been constantly reading and hearing that the current period of volatility is unlike anything ever seen before, it isn't. As shown, the number of 1% days reached 64 out of 90 back in October 2002, 56 out of 90 back in 1988, and 54 out of 90 back in 1974. And the 15 out of 90 that have been 2% days are nowhere near the highs reached during those periods either. The reason why so many people are so frantic about volatility is because it was extremely low preceding the current period. As shown, it was rare to see a 1% day from about 2004 to 2007, and 2% days were non-existent.
Subscribe to Bespoke Premium to receive more in-depth research from Bespoke.




Reader Comments (4)
In fact the (annualized) variance for the just finished 3-month period between December 21, 2007 and March 19, 2008 has been 578.38 (settlement value of the CFE March '08 3-month variance futures contract), that means the annualized realized volatility (square root of variance) has been 24.05%.
Although that is the highest realized volatility since April 2, 2003 (annualized 3-month variance of 585.79), going back only until January 2, 1986, 475 out of a total of 5601 trading days saw a historical rolling 3-month (63 trading days) annualized variance higher than 578.38 (24.05%).
The highest realized 3-month (63 trading days) annualized variance has been 4007.98 (63.31%) on January 12, 1988, the 3-month period following Black Monday on October 19, 1987.
One remark: The measurement of the rolling 3-month (63 trading days) annualized variance does not take into account the SOQ (special opening quotations) of the S&P 500 (closing values only) as it is the case concerning the settlement value of the CFE 3-month variance future on March 19, 2008 (but that would cause only a very minor deviation, if any).
The conclusions stated above concerning the rolling annualized realized 3-month variance are almost perfectly compliant to Bespoke's measurement of historical rolling 1% and 2% moves in the S&P 500.
I beg your pardon for not being a native speaker.
You could have fooled me. Superb writing.